Urban Prototyping – exploring temporary and permanent

Everyone seems to be talking about tactical urbanism these days, and at Gehl we are interested in how we can re-imagine notions of ‘temporary’ and ‘permanent’ to ensure that urban environments can evolve in sync with rapidly changing urban cultures.

The Pavement to Parks program in San Francisco has allowed locals to actively engage in the public realm while introducing a new type of public space in the City

Traditional connotations of temporary imply ‘cheap’, ‘low-quality’ and lacking design rigor.  While ‘permanent’ seems to inspire a sense of quality and finality we’ve come to appreciate in our cities.  Yet typical financing and approval process for urban design projects can take over 10 years to move from concept to construction. Thus permanent projects are outdated before the ribbons are cut and opening ceremonies are held.  That is neither an efficient nor effective use of scarce resources, finances and man-power.

Temporary initiatives when integrated as part of a wider street-design process can act as public consultation, at actual scale and in real-time – thus making a project process more inclusive, effective, engaging and efficient. A re-interpretation of what is ‘temporary’ and ‘permanent’ might make the public realm less susceptible to boom and bus property cycles, helping the successful design of the new permanent, which may be ‘permanently temporary’.

It has been said that we will experience the equivalent of 100 years of cultural change over the next thirty years.  We have to develop new models for conceiving, testing, financing and implementing projects that respond to this reality. Rapid urban prototyping, pilot projects, and the tactical urbanism approach are the first steps at addressing the speed in which the way we move, meet, and spend time in cities is changing.

A festival on this topic is happening this weekend in San Francisco, the Urban Prototyping Festival on 5th and Mission, San Francisco 12pm – 10pm with a panel discussion on ‘Learning about Cities from Data & Citizen Sensors’ at 7pm with Gehl Architect’s Jeff Risom.

  1. autozapper said:

    Reblogged this on Autozapper’s Blog and commented:
    Es mas prudente probar cambios de manera temporal, ajustarlos conforme a las observaciones y sugerencias de la comunidad y hasta no pasar un tiempo razonable de funcionamiento correcto, no hacerlas permanentes y si en el periodo de prueba no convencen sus beneficios, deshecharla, a un minimo costo.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,596 other followers

%d bloggers like this: