Travel distance 7km – Travel Time 1 hour and 24 minutes

Vehicular traffic is taking over the Chinese cities (here Beijing). Still there are a high number of cyclists on the streets. But the bicycle culture is suffering under the new king of the road and so are the cities.

With Copenhagen facing the issue of whether the solution to reduce car traffic in the central city is the “Betalingsring” (Payment Ring), hand in hand with reduced fares on public transportation or not, many other cities around the world also struggle with vehicular traffic taking over the streets. Traveling and working in China this issue is even more present. In China the urban population is growing rapidly and so is the number of cars. In Beijing 1000 new vehicles enter the streets every week. This is a trend we see all over China; the car is the king and it is a popular king. This is true even though there is a long tradition of bicycling and we still see a high number of cyclists on the streets: both commuters on regular bicycles and on the very popular E-Bike, sometimes carrying four to five people at a time, as well as traders taking their goods to the market on bicycles loaded with everything from pineapples to birdcages. But the bicycle culture is suffering under the new king of the Chinese roads. And so are the cities.

Traffic is chaotic and hours spent on congested roads, or as for these cyclists in Kunming waiting to cross the road, cause even more chaos as people try to weave their way through traffic.

Congestion is a major challenge and it affects the nation on many different levels. Besides hours wasted on congested roads, pollution is a major challenge to both the environment as well as to public health. In Kunming, a city of 5 million inhabitants in the south of China, they want to turn this situation around in order to solve the rising congestion problems that the city faces. They are planning for better public transportation and have succeeded in introducing a BRT system and several metro lines are under construction. Still, there is a need to take more means into consideration in order to ensure a better traffic flow on the streets of Kunming. Going from the central city to the airport – a distance of 7km, really showed us how congested the city is, especially at peak hours: 1 hour and 24 minutes later we arrived to the airport. For my colleagues and me this was just one day and one trip, but for the citizens of Kunming this is everyday life. Traffic is chaotic. Cars, buses, bicycles, e-bikes and pedestrians all try to make it the best they can, causing even more chaos. Cars occupy the BRT lane and the bicycle lanes often lack direct links, causing cyclists to go in the wrong direction and crossing at red lights and even more often parked cars block the bicycle lanes. And by looking at the faces of the people waiting for the next BRT bus it seems that they have been waiting for quite a while and this probably does not add a positive image to public transportation.

During rush hour in Kunming even very short distances become extremely long as the traffic snails its way through the city. A trip of 7km, from the central city to the airport by car, can take more than an hour.

I do want to stress the fact that Kunming in many aspects is a really wonderful city. Besides being known as ‘Spring City’ because of the warm climate, Kunming has a pedestrianized city centre with beautifully renewed historical buildings, markets and with modern shopping streets blending in. It is surrounded by amazing nature areas, from mountains to lakes and rivers and the Panlong River runs like a structural backbone through Kunming providing a distinct character to the city, even though this could be explored even more. But the fact that the city is expanding rapidly with numerous new town areas, many along the Panlong River, lacking centers of their own puts high pressure the old city centre and even more so on the roads.

Kunming is not only traffic chaos. The old city centre is very pedestrian friendly and offers both historical environments and markets as well as modern shopping streets and restaurants.

Kunming, also ‘called Spring City’ because of its’ warm climate, has a high green space ratio providing good microclimate in many of the urban spaces, especially along the Panlong River, that runs though the city as a structural backbone

Children bathing in the Panlong River

How can Kunming keep expanding to meet the demands for new housing areas, adding more users to the roads and at the same time solve the rising congestion problems that the city faces? Is it enough to improve public transportation and walking conditions in the city or is it essential to re-brand the bicycle as the most sustainable and fastest way to get around and in that sense support it by improving the conditions for cyclists in the city? Is it a question of looking into traffic modal split on the existing roads or even road pricing? Or is it a question about traffic culture and focusing on how to change that culture and is that even possible? And so on. And this does not only apply for Kunming, but for numerous cities all over China. There is no doubt about it being highly complex and it might not be a question of driving or not driving. The fact that the car is popular cannot and should not be ignored, but something needs to be done in order to create balance on the streets and to obtain good urban environments for all.

Kunming is a rapidly expanding city and the congestion problems are rising as more cars enter the streets. To ensure a good urban environment for all users, the question is whether to keep expanding the roads and invite even more cars in, or whether focus should be on improving the conditions for public transportation, pedestrians and cyclists.

Luxembourg is a beautiful city with a strong presence of history and beautiful green valleys between the different plateaus that accommodates the city fabric. The scale of the city centre is low and quite dense with beautiful public spaces and pedestrian streets. But Luxembourg also has a number of challenges especially around mobility; for example biking is considered almost impossible because of the topography (traversing the up to 40m difference between the plateaus is hard work for both pedestrians and bicyclists). The hope is that the planned new elevators at central nodes in the city will help to promote biking as the most efficient, healthy and sustainable daily transport mode.

The City is divided onto two plateaus.

The main pedestrian zone

Jan Gehl visited Luxembourg in the spring of 2011 and introduced people oriented planning as a means to create living, sustainable, healthy and diverse cities. Gehl Architects was then invited by the city of Luxembourg to give a capacity building program ‘Cities for People’ in February 2012. The main aim of the program was to kick start a change of mind-set, from traffic planning to people planning. Throughout the 5 days program we introduced theory, methods and tools to put people in the centre of planning, specifically focusing on mobility and sociability. The program was a mix of theory, best practice-presentations, workshop exercises and field work, a public lecture and interviews for local media.

The hands-on workshop gave participants an opportunity to discuss concrete plans and strategies for the city

The City had invited planners from different departments of the city administration, traffic engineers, the city manager, the architectural foundation, planners from state planning departments and cultural- and event-planners. Bringing together people from different departments and make them cooperate and share knowledge was a big success. People working with urban planning in different departments and from different perspectives got an occasion to meet each other in person and to discuss the city’s visions, strategies and the means to improve the public realm. They got a shared experience, and the same tools and references to use in their future work in the city of Luxembourg – from a shared people first perspective.

Gehl Architects is looking forward to the next steps taken by the city of Luxembourg.

Workshop participants apply Gehl’s public life and public space survey methods in one of the main squares of Luxembourg

Beatriz Pineda Revilla an urban designer, took this photo last autumn in Amsterdam when people in the neighbourhood started to prepare trees for the cold winter. Thank you for sharing this wonderful example of human creative spirit. We’re always on the look for new inspiring examples of human behavior. Read more here.

Photo; Beatriz Pineda Revilla

Bjørvika harbour elevated highway demolition

The elevated urban highway has been symbolic in the eyes of urbanists since the seminal fight between Jane Jacobs and Robert Moses played out in in 1968 Greenwich Village over the Lower Manhattan Expressway.  This defining moment marked the beginnings of the grouping of intellectuals and activists around the subject of the city, our own Professor Gehl among them. As Icons of a long failed project, it seems odd that only now have we finally reached the moment of political courage and the investment-will in people over cars to dismantle them. Let the bulldozers begin! All over the world discussions around the dismantling of elevated freeways near waterfronts are being pushed to the front of the agenda, Seattle Alaskan Way Viaduct, Buffalo Skyway; New York Sheridan Expressway; Milwaukee Park East freeway; what  is now the Seuol Cheonggyecheon River and the Madrid Rio Park all plan to – or have remediated seafronts or river basins, reconnecting them with city fabric. The rise in value of waterfront development and changes in the goals of city life have made ’green infrastructure’ more valuable than ’grey’ for developers and city officials alike. The Madrid Rio Park is enormous in scale and ambition partly as it has been coupled with the re-linking of outer neighbourhoods adjacent to the park with the city centre through light rail and metro stations. Seoul Chenonggyechon river restoration has revolutionised behaviour and quality of life in the down town district. The enormity of the urban change these projects have facilitated is a very exciting prospect for Oslo as the Harbour is returned to the city. Lin, one of the project architects took a minute to reflect on the elegance of this process and took this photograph. She has worked for over 8 years on the Bjørvika harbour scheme and has long imagined this moment. The scheme re-stiches distinct elements of the city with new public spaces onto the bays of the harbour.

 

As respose to last weeks post Do you join in? We received several wonderful images, among them were these from Fellicity, who works for a company that is contributing to a public realm improvement project “Re-imagining Bairnsdale”.

Fellicity writes; Gehl’s book Cities for People is being used as guiding principles to develop a masterplan and detailed designs that seek to improve the quality of Bairnsdale’s public spaces; to make them more pedestrian friendly and enjoyable.

We are happy to inspire good public spacs around the world and wish Fellicity and her team the best for the project.

Photo; Fellicity Di Lorenzo

Photo; Fellicity Di Lorenzo

Fellicity Di Lorenzo writes; This picture is of a small stencil we’ve made to put up in the streets to help build awareness and start a dialogue about what changes we can make to the CBD to improve its quality; to re-imagine Bairnsdale. Its temporary wash-off chalk of course!

Late last year we asked Hugh Nicholson, Head of Urban Design for Christchurch City Council, to reflect on his personal experiences of the earthquake and the significance of the recovery plan. This is the second of two blog entries where we present his answers to the questions we asked him, together with photos we took while working on site.

Q2: Could you describe what a ‘recovery plan’ is and what the process of producing one has meant for Christchurch?

A: A recovery plan is both a vision for what the rebuilt city will be like and the tools or projects that will take it along the path to recovery.  It provides a programme of infrastructure repair, public investment and transitional projects to stimulate recovery and provides a framework for private investment including incentives and regulation.  The Christchurch City Council was required to prepare a recovery plan for the central city in nine months by the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act.  We delivered it to the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Minister in eight months.  We had a team of more than sixty people working on the Plan in the drafting stages. The team included Council staff and a number of external consultants including Gehl Architects.

One of the most inspiring parts of the project was the public engagement through Share an Idea.   We included a weekend long public expo with exhibitions, public speakers, virtual tours of the red zone, and a great interactive website where people could see their ideas alongside everybody elses.  Check out Share an Idea.  It generated 106,000 ideas and themes and gave us a powerful community vision to underpin the Plan.

Papawai Otakaro

 Q3: Which project from the plan are you most looking forward to implementing?

As the design leader for the development of the Central City Plan I have been focused on maintaining the overall coherence of the Plan and integrating the wide range of projects to best enable recovery – so of course I am most looking forward to delivering the whole recovery plan…but I do have my favourite projects of course. 

  • Papawai Otakaro, the new Avon River park will be a new waterfront for the people of Christchurch and offers the opportunity to weave new values, both ecological and indigenous through the central city.   A ‘green’ bridge over the Avon will provide a centre-piece for the park.
  • The new metro-sports facility offers the chance to develop a range of sporting facilities in a sporting precinct and celebrate Christchurch’s proud sporting culture.
  • A redeveloped hospital will offer modern high quality healthcare in safe and resilient buildings in case Christchurch ever has to face another disaster like this one.

Book, Spatial Culture

The book Spatial Culture is a response to the otherwise dominant visual culture. It has articles on dance in NYC, the experience of darkness on Christiania, the writings of Rem Koolhaas, the rebuilding of Dresden’s Frauenkirche and lot’s more. With Pia Rost Rasmussen, I have written an article on the plans for Ørestad, a new part of Copenhagen. It is a reading of the competition programme with the use of French philosopher Michel de Certeau’s terms. The anthology is mainly in Danish, but abstracts and image texts are in English + an introduction in English by Henrik Reeh setting the scene for spatial culture and an article by Alberto Pérez-Gómez from McGill, Canada.

If you are in town, you are welcome to the book launch at the Danish Architecture Center, 8 February 2012, 4-6 pm.

This week’s picture is a little out of the ordinary. The photo from Elise made me think of all the subtle forms of dialogue that takes place in the city. On her blog Elise writes; These days I’m trying my best. I’m trying my best to look at things. And there are so many when you stop for a moment.

I’d like to pose a question to all of you. What interventions have inspired you in your city? Have you ever contributed to this form of ‘urban dialogue’?  If you have a picture you have taken to contribute, please send it to me, jo@gehlarchitects.dk. You can read more here

Photo; Elise*

Late last year we asked Hugh Nicholson, Head of Urban Design for Christchurch City Council, to reflect on his personal experiences of the earthquake and the significance of the recovery plan. Over two blog entries we will present his answers to the questions we asked him, together with photos we took while working on site.

Gehl asked: Hugh, what did the earthquake mean to you personally?

A: People often say what a ‘great opportunity’ it must be to redesign a city but it comes at a great cost.  It’s hard to describe the fear and loss of security when the ground you are standing on shakes and tears the city apart around you, not once but five times with more than 7,000 smaller aftershocks.  My house has collapsed and we do not know yet whether we can rebuild on our land.  In my neighbourhood approximately 20% of the houses are still occupied and many of our local shops and our local supermarket have been demolished. We have rented a house nearby but it has been damaged also with plywood covering broken windows, propped walls and cracked internal lining.  Of our six immediate neighbours two are still occupied, two are unoccupied and two have been demolished.  I have helped to demolish seven chimneys on various houses to make them safe.

We have been working out of temporary offices at the City Art Gallery which became the Emergency Operations Centre since the earthquakes. Working out of an art gallery sounds quite romantic but actually they don’t make very good offices – they don’t have windows in the galleries and this one was either too hot or too cold. The gallery was within the cordoned off central city for some time and we had to pass through several army checkpoints just to get to work. The ‘safe’ route in or out would sometimes change so quickly as dangerous buildings were identified that we would end up leaving the office by a different route than the one we arrived on that morning. Last week one of the local cafes which we had been frequenting for more than six months was closed and evacuated when engineers found that a neighbouring block of apartments was dangerously unstable.

More than half of the buildings in the Central Business District will be demolished. More than 6,000 houses cannot be rebuilt and whole communities will have to relocate and find new places to live.  Another 6,000 households including my family are waiting to find out whether we can rebuild.

My work has completely changed since the earthquakes.  Initially the urban design and heritage team were involved in the emergency response authorising the demolition or emergency repairs to heritage buildings as the search & rescue teams searched for bodies and tried to make areas safe.  Subsequently we started to think about recovery and have spent the last eight months preparing the Central Recovery City Plan Our work has been characterised by uncertainty and working in parallel.  There is never enough information to be sure you are making the right decision, and there is nobody who knows how to do it or what the answer is. We are always short of time and having to work in parallel in order to make progress.  The final geotechnical report confirming that it was possible to rebuild safely in the central city only arrived one week before we published the draft Central City Recovery Plan to be approved by the Minister.

Looking back I still wonder at the dedication and support of Gehl Architects and particularly David, Simon and Ewa who came halfway round the world to live and work in a natural disaster area and to help the people of Christchurch to develop a vision for what the city might look like as it rebuilds…

Next week we will present the other half of his response, considering the significance of the recovery plan.

An argument for shifting the currently dysfunctional discourse about driving and taxes in Denmark.

The problems that the Betalingsring is trying to solve originate not in our city centre but in our suburbs, we need to improve the quality of the town centers that comprise Copenhagen metropolitan region ensuring they are walkable, bike-able and provide everyday amenities.  We need to improve connections and accessibility between these town centers and into the centre of Copenhagen.  We need broad investment in a variety of transit options from car-sharing to public transit to ensure high quality alternatives and most importantly we need to consider the suburbs and promote medium density and quality housing.  We want a city that works in the center and at the edges.

The current discourse about the congestion charge (betalingsring) in Copenhagen has focused on the political differences between left leading urbanites and more conservative car owners.  We aim to shift the discussion from mere political grandstanding to what ought to be the key question; how do we achieve good quality of life for all Copenhageners, a question which we all need to take seriously and responsibility for achieving. Improving quality of life and making a better city for our shared future is about more than charging motorists to drive into the centre. It should be visionary, ambitious and holistic in approach. However as with any problem – before we presume to propose solutions we must carefully take measure and assess where exactly the problems lie?

Some of the key ingredients of a good town centre

Besides being poorly named and branded, the betalingsring, (which roughly translates as payment ring) where the current political discourse is centrifugally focused – has also narrowed the view of the problem to within the confines of the city centre of Copenhagen. This is actually the inverse of where we believe the problems originate. The relative lack of quality and offer in the town centres that stretch along Copenhagen’s pioneering finger plan; the quality of other transit options (besides private vehicle) that connect the center to its suburbs and the absence of public transit connections between the suburbs, we believe go some-way to describing the transit and spatial problem. Mobility choices are multi-dimensional and people’s preferences complex so we need to investigate the wider view that encompass  social preferences that influence human choice; Why do we have so many people driving into the centre, and also why do we have so many driving within localities in the suburbs. Because they can? Because they have to? Because they like to? We need to find out if anything is to change. The Danish Society of Engineers have come out to say that amongst experts only 4 out of 10 believe that the betalingsring will work as hoped. Infrastructure and technology to develop safe cities, low-carbon transit solutions, green energy alternatives and other sustainable initiatives can only succeed if people choose to use it, or in the case of betalingsring, it effects change as predicted. Establishing a bike-share program is only sustainable if cyclists use it. Investing in public transport is only worthwhile if it is comfortable and convenient.  Implementing urban elements to promote safety will only be effective if people behave the way we predict they will. Behavioral understanding is central in the design of any potentially successful interventions.

Ways to add quality to the design of town centres

Just as we have made our city centre walkable, bike-able and attractive – this should be applied more widely creating towns that provide everyday amenities.   In our experience with working in transit hubs in both Gothenburg and Skåne, improving  the quality within 1km of the transit hubs including park and ride schemes, reliable wifi connections that support working while commuting and other initiatives that improve convenience can greatly increase the attractiveness of public transport and really affect people’s transit choices. The London congestion charge scheme generated £930 million of revenue between 2003-2007 but such are the operating costs, only 30% of that was re-invested into public transport.  We need efficient investment, from a mixture of public and private investors as well as from social entrepreneurs to invite alternatives in a variety of transit forms from community car-pools and commercial car clubs to increased reliability on existing rail lines.  Finally and most importantly we need to consider the suburbs’ configuration and promote medium density and quality housing as well as educating consumers about the costs and conveniences of different housing choices.  We want a city with attractive suburban hubs that complement the centre.

In defining what kind of city we want, Gehl Architects argue that a congestion charge alone can’t provide what growing families; ambitious professionals, ageing seniors – people who live in small apartments in the centre or have a house and car in the suburbs- most desire from their city. A safe, healthy, vibrant, attractive, accessible, and ultimately sustainable city.  The answer to this ambitious vision lies both in a holistic and comprehensive regional view as well as the technical details of any scheme for charging motorists in Copenhagen City Centre.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 707 other followers